Yes that was one of the reasons.
Another was that since this is a consensus based system rather than a legal framework. It's crucial that schemes interact with QA and feel that is is to their advantage and important for their development, (rather than the punitive like OFSTED). So not making the outcome public is a way to minimise potential fear of engaging.
@David
Yes that was one of the reasons.
Another was that since this is a consensus based system rather than a legal framework. It's crucial that schemes interact with QA and feel that is is to their advantage and important for their development, (rather than the punitive like OFSTED). So not making the outcome public is a way to minimise potential fear of engaging.